Both Teams To Score Betting — How It Works, What It Costs And Where To Bet It

Updated October 2026

Licensed

Available in US

Fast payouts

18+ Only

The 90th-minute equaliser that turns a quiet draw into a 1-1 lands squarely on one market the bookmaker calls BTTS, short for Both Teams To Score. It is one of the simplest football bets to read on a betting slip: pick yes if both sides should find the net, no if at least one side keeps a clean sheet, and the odds shorten or lengthen with the shape of the fixture. The complication is not the bet itself but the layer of fees and rules that sit between the price and the payout. This page is about that layer: how BTTS is priced, how it is voided or settled, what the bookmaker keeps of every pound wagered, and which of the ten licensed bookmakers reviewed below offer it under terms a British punter can actually rely on.

Current as of 26 October 2026 · verified against the Gambling Commission’s public register.

Statute: What Regulates BTTS In Great Britain

Britain’s betting shops, websites and apps sit inside a single regime. The Gambling Act 2005, with the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act 2014 on top of it, requires any operator whose remote facilities are used by customers in Great Britain to hold a Gambling Commission licence, regardless of where the operator is incorporated. Northern Ireland is a separate legal jurisdiction and falls outside the 2005 Act; a GB licence does not cover it. A Curaçao, Malta or Gibraltar licence is not a substitute for a GB one and does not bring the operator within the Commission’s reach.

The Commission issues operating licences under categories laid out in the Act and its secondary legislation. For ordinary BTTS wagers the relevant category is the remote general betting standard (real events) licence. Pool betting on horse or dog racing runs under a separate licence, betting exchanges run under a betting intermediary licence, and virtual events sit in their own standard (virtual events) bucket. Most of the brands below hold the real-events standard and offer BTTS under it; none of them runs an exchange licence here.

There is no statutory list of permitted bets. Operators design and price their own markets under the Licence Conditions and Codes of Practice and the Commission’s Remote Technical Standards. That leaves room for both teams to score, both teams to score in both halves, BTTS and over 2.5, score-and-win doubles and any other variant the operator wants to add, so long as the operator’s own rules govern them and the Commission can challenge them on fairness or social-responsibility grounds.

What the rules actually say about football matches

The mechanics of BTTS are not in statute. They are in the operator’s own settlement rules. Three rules from Sky Bet’s published football rules cover most of the ground and are broadly representative of how the licensed market settles football markets:

• Football bets are settled on 90 minutes of play unless the market says otherwise. The 90 minutes includes time added for stoppages; extra time and penalty shootouts do not count, unless the market is specifically an extra-time market.
• A match abandoned after kick-off leaves already-decided bets standing and voids all others. The carve-out is a restart announced within 3 hours of the original kick-off and completed within 3 days of the abandonment.
• First-goalscorer bets settle on the result after 90 minutes including injury time, so a goal in added time still counts.

A BTTS “yes” only needs each side to score once inside those 90 minutes, and the bookmaker settles on those rules whether the wager was placed before kick-off or in the in-play window after the match has started. Where a market says otherwise — a specific extra-time BTTS, a tournament-wide BTTS over a multi-leg tie — the market’s own settlement text overrides the default.

Tax and the player’s take

The bettor pays no tax on winnings in Great Britain. General Betting Duty is the operator’s tax on its gross profit from betting, currently 15%. The remote betting rate inside that duty rises to 25% on 1 April 2027 for remote bets that are not on UK horse racing, not at self-service betting terminals in licensed premises, and not pool betting or in-person betting; until then the remote rate stays at 15%. Whether operators pass duty on through tighter odds is not established, and it is never right to write that the player is charged duty. The Commission’s own statutory levy is a separate charge on operators and is not a tax on the customer.

Marketing and bonus rules a BTTS offer sits inside

Bonuses, free bets and price boosts on BTTS — and the wagering conditions that come with them — sit inside the Commission’s marketing and promotion rules. Since 19 January 2026 wagering requirements on bonuses are limited to a multiple of 10x. A £10 bonus requiring 50x turnover, the kind of headline figure that used to be common, is no longer offered under a GB licence. Mixed-product promotions — offers that gate one product on another, like “bet on football to get casino free spins” — are banned. Credit cards have been off the table for gambling in Great Britain since 14 April 2020; debit cards and bank transfers are not.

Safeguards: How The Regime Protects The Punter

The player-protection framework sits alongside the licensing one, and BTTS punters sit inside it whether or not they realise it. Three pieces are worth knowing in detail.

Identity verification is the first. Since 7 May 2019 a customer cannot deposit or gamble, including with a free bet or bonus, until name, address and date of birth have been verified. There is no anonymous play at a licensed site. That fact cuts both ways: it slows the sign-up flow and costs the operator the data, but it also closes off the underage route the regulator was worried about.

GAMSTOP is the second. It is the national multi-operator online self-exclusion scheme and a mandatory licence condition for every online operator in the regime since 31 March 2020. A self-exclusion period runs six months, one year, five years, or five years with auto-renewal; once the minimum period ends, the exclusion stays in place for a further seven years unless the customer asks GAMSTOP to remove it. The scheme covers online sites and apps, and a separate service covers betting shops. Every customer of the brands reviewed below is in scope.

The financial vulnerability check is the third, and it is the newest piece of the framework. From 28 February 2025 a check applies at a licensed remote operator when a customer’s deposits minus withdrawals exceed £150 in any rolling 30 days: it is a public-record check (bankruptcy, county court judgments), not an income or credit reference check. A separate, heavier financial risk-assessment regime has been announced in stages with no live start date yet, and any reporting of it should say exactly that. There is no state-set deposit or loss ceiling for betting — limits are the customer’s own choice, on top of which operators may restrict a customer outright.

The help side sits with GamCare and the National Gambling Helpline, GambleAware, NHS gambling clinics and Gamblers Anonymous. Operators themselves run reality-check prompts and product-level deposit-limit tools. What none of this changes is the basic economics: the price on a BTTS market carries the bookmaker’s margin, the bonus carries its own turnover, and the safeguards do not soften either.

Bankroll, Forecast And The Hard Edges Of BTTS Strategy

Search traffic around both teams to score splits into two camps. One camp wants the picks. The other wants the framework that makes picks sensible. The picks are not on this page — no published list of “best BTTS bets today” can survive an honest audit, because nobody can know an outcome in advance and a reader who follows the picks loses real money on the page’s word. What is on the page is the framework underneath.

What the price actually carries

Every BTTS price carries the bookmaker’s margin. The market is a two-outcome proposition — yes or no — and on each outcome the bookmaker offers decimal odds shorter than a fair even-money line. The margin is the difference between what the punter stakes and what the bookmaker pays back if both outcomes are taken at the offered prices. As an illustrative example, take a market priced at decimal odds 1.90 on yes and 1.90 on no, a roughly even book. The payout share of one pound staked across both outcomes is:

1 ÷ (1 ÷ 1.90 + 1 ÷ 1.90) = 1 ÷ (0.5263 + 0.5263) = 1 ÷ 1.0526 ≈ 0.9500.

The margin is the complement of that figure, so 1 − 0.9500 = 0.0500, or about 5%. That band — roughly 4% to 8% on a typical BTTS book before kick-off, often wider in the live in-play window — is the slice the bookmaker keeps from every pound staked on the market. It is a charge on the punter who has no edge; it is a cost the punter with an edge can absorb.

Why both teams to score is unusually volatile

BTTS is one of the more volatile popular markets, because the proposition only settles one way once any goal lands. A “no” bet is alive as long as either side keeps a clean sheet; a “yes” bet settles the moment both sides have scored, which can be the 5th minute or the 89th. That asymmetry matters. Bookmakers price the market on goalscoring probability, but they also price in the asymmetric payout — the fact that “no” stays open longer means a punt on “yes” has more risk of a late wipe-out than a punt on “no” does of an early wipe-out, and the price reflects that. In-play prices move quickly on the first goal, and a “yes” backed pre-match usually drifts when one side goes ahead and shortens only if the trailing side responds.

Practical bankroll framing for BTTS

Three principles sit above any specific system a punter might read elsewhere. None of them is original, and none of them is a winning system — they are the ones that stop the framework from bleeding out the bank.

First, the staking unit matters more than the pick. A 1% bankroll unit on a market at a 5% margin means a steady drip of about 0.05% per bet at true probabilities, and the variance of BTTS is wide enough to drive longer losing runs than most markets. Smaller units are the difference between a bankroll that lasts a season and one that does not.

Second, the qualifier is the price. A BTTS bet priced at decimal odds of 1.50 with a true probability around 50% is a bad bet even if the selection is right more often than not. The qualifier for a free bet with a wagering condition, in fact, is rarely lower than the equivalent of decimal odds of 1.50 to 1.67, and the offered BTTS price often sits below the threshold when the favourite is heavy.

Third, in-play and pre-match are different books. The margin widens in-play because the bookmaker’s risk is updated continuously; pre-match the bookmaker has had time to balance the action. A punter who treats BTTS as a pre-match product and only dips into the in-play window for specific moments has a fairer fight than one who lets in-play prices set the day’s expectation.

What tips pages actually do

The free tips pages that turn up in the search are useful in one specific way: they are a record of how the public prices a market. They are not a record of what wins. Most tipsters charge or run affiliate revenue off the back of those pages, which is a strong economic reason to publish a confident pick every day, and the academic literature on sports tipping does not find consistent edges that survive those incentives. The honest framing is that BTTS, like every popular market, a one the bookmakers have spent a decade pricing efficiently, and the bettor’s edge comes from information the market has not absorbed, not from a public list of picks.

Selection, Settling And Staking: What The Market Is

BTTS is a goal-counting proposition on a single match. The simplest form asks whether each side scores at least once in normal time. The expanded forms layer other conditions on top — both teams to score and the match result, both teams to score in both halves, both teams to score and over a certain total — and each one prices the multiple conditions against a single fixture. The leg of a longer bet builder or accumulator is the same proposition inside a larger frame.

The shape of a BTTS bet builder leg

A bet builder is a same-fixture accumulator the operator prices on the spot. A four-leg BTTS bet builder — both teams to score, over 2.5 goals, total corners over 9.5, and the home side to receive a card — was priced per selection with the operator’s margin applied at each leg. The combined price multiplies leg by leg, and the combined margin sits well above the margin of any one leg. That is why bet builders look generous on the betting slip and sting on settlement: the price compounds the margin, and the average cost per leg is higher than the headline number on any single leg suggests.

Settlement under football rules

Settlement under a licensed operator’s football rules treats the 90 minutes as the match. Added time counts, extra time and penalties do not, and an abandoned match leaves already-decided bets standing and voids all others unless the operator’s rules provide for a restart window. The same rules apply whether the BTTS bet is a single pre-match wager, a leg of an in-play bet builder, or the last leg of a 12-fold accumulator. The settlement rule does the talking; the bet shape is only how the punter chose to bundle it.

Staking the bet

Staking is the punt that gets put down. A £10 stake at decimal odds 1.55 returns £15.50 (£10 stake plus £5.50 profit) on a winning BTTS bet, and the same £10 at decimal odds 2.40 returns £24.00 (£10 stake plus £14.00 profit). The return formula is straightforward: return = stake × odds. The net profit formula subtracts the stake from the return: net profit = stake × (odds − 1). For a combination bet, the odds of the legs multiply into a single combined price, and the return formula applies to the combined price. The accumulator price compounds the margin the same way the bet builder does, and the staking math is the same.

The Ten Licensed Bookmakers Reviewed Below

Every brand in this comparison is on the Gambling Commission’s public register against a remote general betting standard (real events) licence. Some of them share a licensee — BetUK and BetMGM sit under LeoVegas Gaming, for instance — and that is not a problem; the licence is held by the operating company, and the brands are run as separate products under it. Where one brand is published by another, the comparison reflects that arrangement.

Two standards govern the assessment. First, what the brand states in its own terms about BTTS and the markets that wrap it. Second, what the licensed framework requires of every brand by way of identity verification, GAMSTOP coverage, and the bonus and wagering rules. Both are checked at the same time, because a brand offering competitive BTTS prices inside a weak compliance framework is offering the wrong trade.

The table below sets out the licence position and the BTTS-relevant terms of each brand. Cells reflect what is publicly stated by the brand or the Commission’s register.

BetUK — LeoVegas Gaming PLC

BetUK runs on a remote general betting standard (real events) licence held by LeoVegas Gaming PLC under Commission account 39198. The brand sits inside a wider LeoVegas group that also runs BetMGM UK, and the BTTS offering is the standard football product the group is known for across European leagues. The free-bet exclusion list is the practical shape of the offer: virtual sports, esports and non-UK/IE horse racing are out, and any minimum-odds qualifier on the welcome package applies across the rest. The exclusion list is not unusual for the market but it does narrow the surface on which a BTTS punter can use free-bet tokens, since virtuals and esports are sometimes the only side products open at certain fixtures. The verdict: a competent mid-market BTTS book, useful for the punter who already has a LeoVegas account and not a reason on its own to open one.

Betway — Betway Limited

Betway’s licence sits under Commission account 39372, and the brand’s BTTS book covers the major European leagues plus the usual international menu. The welcome offer pays out in four £10 free bet tokens after a first settled bet of at least £10 at minimum decimal odds 2.0, with a 7-day expiry and a debit-card-only deposit requirement. The 2.0 qualifier is the operative number: a BTTS favourite priced anywhere below decimal odds 2.0 will not qualify the first bet, and the punter who backs a heavy favourite to clear the wagering has to accept the offer’s conditions as written. The verdict: a strong BTTS book in pricing depth, and the welcome offer is decent only if the qualifying bet lands at the right end of the market.

Midnite — Midnite Limited

Midnite operates under Commission account 101839 and brands itself around esports, but the sportsbook itself is a full BTTS book on football. The site surfaces in-play events, an acca builder, popular accas and price boosts with maximum-stake limits, and the welcome package pays £25 in free bets plus 50 free spins after a £5+ pre-match bet at minimum odds of EVS (2.0) within 14 days of sign-up, with a 7-day expiry. The price boosts and acca features are where a BTTS punter spends most of their time here, because the operator’s “popular accas” surface pre-built combinations that include BTTS legs at composite prices. The verdict: worth a look for the in-play and acca features; less so for the punter who wants to build a single BTTS bet from scratch at margin-only prices.

DAZN Bet — DZBT Limited

DAZN Bet runs on Commission account 48756, and the BTTS offering sits inside a wider product that includes Cash Out, Bet Builder, daily bet boosts and in-play. The cash-out caveat is the line to read: DAZN Bet states that cash-out availability is not guaranteed and that bets stand if cash-out is unavailable, which means a punt that the punter expected to be able to trade out can be left open against an in-play goal. The bet-builder product on DAZN Bet is the standard same-fixture accumulator with the same margin compounding that applies elsewhere. The verdict: a credible BTTS book for the punter who wants bet-builder depth and in-play coverage, with the cash-out caveat a known limitation rather than a dealbreaker.

Betboro — Webmedia Development N.V.

Betboro operates under Commission account 44181 and covers BTTS on football alongside in-play markets and cash-out on football, racing and tennis. The brand’s responsible-gambling stack — deposit limits, reality checks, self-exclusion — sits inside the standard licensed-operator toolkit, and the boosted-odds product runs on selected singles from £10 stakes. The boost mechanic narrows the price on selected BTTS favourites, and a punter who actively hunts the boost list gets a fractionally tighter margin on those selections. The verdict: a solid generalist BTTS book with a useful boost product; not differentiated enough to switch from an existing account for, but worth keeping in rotation.

DragonBet — DragonBet Ltd

DragonBet runs on Commission account 64908 and the app surfaces Welsh football and rugby markets alongside racing, American football, in-play and bet builder. The BTTS offering on the wider European leagues is standard; the Welsh football menu is where the brand is genuinely differentiated, with smaller-market fixtures priced that the bigger books often leave off the board. For a BTTS punter focused on the Welsh pyramid, the brand is one of the few places the bet is consistently available. The verdict: a niche pick for Welsh football, with the standard BTTS book elsewhere on the menu as a fallback rather than the main reason to choose the brand.

Bet600 — Tyche Tech Limited

Bet600 operates under Commission account 44731 and runs a general BTTS book on football with Best Odds Guaranteed on horse racing. The BOG mechanic is irrelevant to BTTS punters, since the SP rule applies only to racing, but the brand’s wider pricing is competitive on the major leagues. The verdict: a competent BTTS book with a racing-focused twist, useful for the punter whose betting card mixes football and racing and not differentiated enough to switch from an existing football-led account for.

Geoff Banks — GB Sports Advisors Limited

Geoff Banks runs on Commission account 54095 and the app surfaces live in-play prices and ante-post prices on future events. The brand is positioned as a smaller independent book rather than a market-leading one, and the BTTS offering is built around a narrower fixture list with a price focus rather than a menu focus. For a BTTS punter, the brand is most useful when a fixture is priced tighter than at the major books — which happens on lower-league and non-league football where the bigger operators’ risk teams price loosely. The verdict: a useful secondary account for the BTTS punter willing to do the fixture-shopping work.

Sky Bet — SBG Sports Limited

Sky Bet operates under Commission account 67370 and is one of the largest BTTS books in the country. The brand’s published football rules are the most-cited settlement rules in the British market: 90 minutes including added time, abandonment rule with a 3-hour / 3-day restart window, and first-goalscorer settled on the 90-minute result. The welcome offer pays £30 in free bets as three £10 tokens after a deposit of at least £5 and a first single or each-way bet of at least 5p at decimal odds 2.0 or greater. The 5p qualifier is generous in headline terms, and the practical effect is that the punter can lock in the qualifying bet on any favourite at the right end of the market. The verdict: the strongest combination of BTTS market depth and welcome offer in the comparison, with published settlement rules that are easy to point to when arguing a void.

Copybet — Copybet UK Limited

Copybet runs on Commission account 53774 and pairs a general BTTS book on football with Best Odds Guaranteed all day every day on UK and Irish racing plus first-past-the-post payment even if the winner is later disqualified. The racing features do not apply to BTTS, but the brand’s pricing on football is competitive and the operator publishes clear terms. The verdict: a credible secondary BTTS book, with the racing features a clear plus for the punter whose betting card crosses sports.

Overview: How BTTS Fits The Wider Market

Both teams to score is one of the standard football markets at every licensed British bookmaker, alongside match result, total goals, both teams to score in both halves, score-and-win doubles, and any number of bet-builder combinations on top. It is priced in two outcomes and sits inside the standard goal-counting framework the bookmakers have built over a decade of in-play data. A punter who knows the market has read this page for the framework, not the picks.

How to check a bookmaker’s licence

The Commission’s public register is the whole test. It is searchable by business name, trading name, domain or account number, and every operator above carries a record against a real-events licence. The register is the place a punt goes when a brand’s own claim about its licence status needs to be checked, and the licence categories tell the punter which markets the operator is allowed to offer — for BTTS specifically the relevant category is remote general betting standard (real events), and every brand in the comparison holds it.

How to read the price on a BTTS market

The price carries the margin. As an illustrative example of a roughly even book on the two outcomes at decimal odds 1.90 / 1.90, the payout share across both outcomes comes out at about 0.95 and the margin at about 5%, in the same band as the rest of the major football book. Margin widens in-play as the bookmaker’s risk is updated continuously, and it widens further on smaller-league fixtures where the operator’s pricing model has less data. The punter who treats BTTS as a pre-match book and reads the margin off the price gets a fairer fight than the punter who reads the price at face value.

How the framework affects what the punter keeps

Three pieces of the framework cut into what the punter keeps. First, the margin on the price itself, sitting between 4% and 8% pre-match on a typical BTTS book. Second, the wagering condition on any free bet or sign-up offer, capped at 10x the bonus base under the bonus cap that came into force on 19 January 2026 and never allowed to bite harder. Third, the verification-and-vulnerability regime that adds friction on sign-up and at higher spend but does not, on a per-bet basis, eat into the punter’s return. The first two are real costs; the third is a friction cost that does not show up in the return formula.

The honest position is that BTTS, like every popular market, is a market the bookmakers have spent years pricing efficiently. The punter’s edge comes from information the market has not absorbed, not from a public list of picks. The framework here is the framework for not losing faster than the punter’s edge justifies, and that is a different question from the question the tippy pages ask. The page answers the framework question.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where can I bet on both teams to score?

Every bookmaker reviewed above is licensed by the Gambling Commission for remote general betting on real events and offers BTTS on major football leagues. The brand-by-brand notes on settlement rules, in-play coverage, bet-builder depth and free-bet terms are in the operator reviews above, and a quick way to check is to open the Commission’s public register and search by trading name to confirm the licence. BTTS is rarely the only market the operator offers on a fixture, so the punter’s choice usually comes down to a wider question about price depth and product features rather than the BTTS market itself.

What does “to score in both halves” mean?

A “score in both halves” market asks whether one named team scores at least once in each of the two halves of a 90-minute football match (45 minutes plus added time per half). It is a BTTS-adjacent market but applied to a single team rather than both. Settlement runs on the same football rules as BTTS — 90 minutes including added time counts, extra time and penalties do not, and an abandoned match voids unsettled bets unless the operator’s rules allow a restart. The price is tighter than a single “to score” market because the proposition is harder to clear, and the punter pays for that difficulty in margin rather than in outright price.

What is a both teams to score bet?

A both teams to score bet is a single proposition on a football match: yes if each side scores at least once in normal time, no if at least one side keeps a clean sheet. It settles on the 90-minute result including added time and excludes extra time and penalties. It can be placed as a single pre-match wager, as a leg of an in-play bet, as a leg of an accumulator, or inside a same-fixture bet builder. The price is the bookmaker’s offer on each of the two outcomes, and the margin sits inside the price the punter sees.

How can I check that a bookmaker holds a Gambling Commission licence?

The Commission’s public register is searchable by business name, trading name, domain or account number, and lists the licence categories the operator holds. For BTTS the relevant category is remote general betting standard (real events), and every brand in the comparison above carries a record against one. The register is the only test that counts: a brand’s own statement of its licence status is a starting point, not a final one, and the punter who wants certainty checks the register.

How is the return on a bet worked out from the stake and the odds?

The return on a winning single bet is the stake multiplied by the decimal odds. Net profit subtracts the stake, so net profit = stake × (odds − 1). For a combination bet — a double, treble, accumulator or bet builder — the odds of the legs multiply into a single combined price, and the same formula applies to the combined price. The decimal odds are the form used in this article; the same stake shows the same arithmetic in fractional form once the punter has converted the price.

What is the bookmaker’s margin and how can it be seen in the odds?

The bookmaker’s margin is the slice of every pound staked that the operator keeps on average. It can be seen by adding up the implied probabilities across all outcomes of a market and subtracting the sum from 1. On a two-outcome market priced at decimal odds 1.90 on each outcome, the implied probabilities are 1 ÷ 1.90 each, summing to about 1.05, so the margin is about 5%. On a three-outcome 1X2 match-result market the same arithmetic runs over the home, draw and away prices. The margin is what makes a bookmaker a bookmaker, and it is the cost the punter pays for the convenience of a fixed price.

Content created by the «Accumulator» team